Optimal Timing of Medical Decisions

Principal Investigator: 
University: 
University of British Columbia
Faculty: 
Sauder School of Business
Department: 
Operations and Logistics Division
Position: 
Assistant Professor
Award Type: 

Questions regarding the proper timing of various medical interventions arise frequently in health care. How often should people be screened for a type of cancer? How often should patients go for laboratory tests to measure the progress of an existing disease? What is the optimal time to initiate a therapy or to switch therapies when one appears to lose its effectiveness? These are difficult decisions because of the need to trade off costs and benefits under uncertainty. For example, screening too frequently results in high system costs as well as inconvenience (and possibly harm) to the patients being screened. On the other hand, treatment outcomes are almost always better when disease is treated earlier than later. Dr. Shechter’s research program aims to develop and apply advanced analytical techniques from the field of operations research (OR) to aid decision-making in questions of clinical timing. The methodological tools of OR were designed specifically to deal with complex decision-making under uncertainty and have been applied for more than 50 years in a variety of areas. With the growing complexity of medical decision-making and the increasing availability of patient medical data, these techniques have become extremely relevant for seeking cost-effective solutions to health-care problems. Clinical timing decisions alone provide a large class of difficult decisions that are well suited for study using these analytical techniques. Dr. Shechter’s research includes two specific projects that will analyze key timing decisions for patients with chronic kidney disease: 1) when is the optimal time to prepare an arteriovenous fistula for patients who eventually start dialysis?; and 2) how often should patients on the kidney transplant waitlist be screened for conditions that may put them at increased surgical risks should a donation become available? With a 500 per cent increase in chronic kidney disease among British Columbians over the past decade, improvements in treatment and screening policies can result in substantial health benefits to patients province-wide. Dr. Shechter will work closely with frontline decision-makers, including nephrologists and kidney transplant surgeons, to develop and validate useful data-driven decision models to address these questions.

Research Pillar: 
Host Institution: 
University of British Columbia
Research Location: 
University of British Columbia - Vancouver Campus
Year: 
2011