KT Encounters: KT 2.0

KT 2.0: The evolution of KT

Filmed and produced by MSFHR. Post-production by the Knowledge Mobilization Studio. Speaker titles and affiliations correct at time of filming.

KT 2.0 takes knowledge translation to the next level, to deepen our understanding and broaden our perspectives as to what might be possible in the field. As researchers and research users engage in meaningful partnerships the challenge will be to embrace complexity in the health system and think differently about addressing problems in health care.

Jump to our other themes:

Share your reflections and continue the discussion by commenting at the bottom of this page.

Speakers

Bev Holmes | VP, Research & Impact, MSFHR
Allan Best | Managing Director, InSource Research Group
Diane Finegood | President & CEO, MSFHR
Peter Levesque | President, Institute for Knowledge Mobilization

Rethinking context

How have multiple contexts (practice, policy, research) impacted your work?
Are research, theory and practice knowledge equally legitimate? When is one more important than the other?
Do you use context-specific KT strategies?

A funder's role

How can funders go beyond monitoring for accountability?
Do funders' programs align with the needs of research users?
How can funders best evaluate system change?

Research culture

Do we need new approaches for patient and public engagement?
How do we get more problem-driven research?
What are the pros and cons of engaging with patients and the public on research?

Embracing complexity

Can you map the complex systems in which you work?
How have you addressed simple, complicated and complex problems in your work?
Do we need a KT 2.0 conceptual model in order to address complexity?

Tips and tools

Do we have the right tools for addressing complex health care problems?
Is there a need for more applied research on specific problems that may or may not be generalizable but could result in health system organizational changes?
Can social media bring about culture change related to health system improvement?

Are we there yet? Hope for the future

Are you hopeful about health system change?
Is KT 2.0 one of the ways to get there?
What timeframe do you use when thinking about health and health system improvement?

Menu

KT Encounters: KT 2.0

KT 2.0: The evolution of KT

Share your reflections and continue the discussion by commenting at the bottom of this page.

Speakers

How have multiple contexts (practice, policy, research) impacted your work?

Are research, theory and practice knowledge equally legitimate? When is one more important than the other?

Do you use context-specific KT strategies?

How can funders go beyond monitoring for accountability?

Do funders' programs align with the needs of research users?

How can funders best evaluate system change?

Do we need new approaches for patient and public engagement?

How do we get more problem-driven research?

What are the pros and cons of engaging with patients and the public on research?

Can you map the complex systems in which you work?

How have you addressed simple, complicated and complex problems in your work?

Do we need a KT 2.0 conceptual model in order to address complexity?

Do we have the right tools for addressing complex health care problems?

Is there a need for more applied research on specific problems that may or may not be generalizable but could result in health system organizational changes?

Can social media bring about culture change related to health system improvement?

Are you hopeful about health system change?

Is KT 2.0 one of the ways to get there?

What timeframe do you use when thinking about health and health system improvement?

Resources to support continued learning

Add new comment

Menu

Search form

KT Encounters: KT 2.0

KT 2.0: The evolution of KT

Share your reflections and continue the discussion by commenting at the bottom of this page.

Speakers

How have multiple contexts (practice, policy, research) impacted your work?

Are research, theory and practice knowledge equally legitimate? When is one more important than the other?

Do you use context-specific KT strategies?

How can funders go beyond monitoring for accountability?

Do funders' programs align with the needs of research users?

How can funders best evaluate system change?

Do we need new approaches for patient and public engagement?

How do we get more problem-driven research?

What are the pros and cons of engaging with patients and the public on research?

Can you map the complex systems in which you work?

How have you addressed simple, complicated and complex problems in your work?

Do we need a KT 2.0 conceptual model in order to address complexity?

Do we have the right tools for addressing complex health care problems?

Is there a need for more applied research on specific problems that may or may not be generalizable but could result in health system organizational changes?

Can social media bring about culture change related to health system improvement?

Are you hopeful about health system change?

Is KT 2.0 one of the ways to get there?

What timeframe do you use when thinking about health and health system improvement?

Resources to support continued learning

Add new comment